www.luntacunt.fora.pl
Luntacunt project
www.luntacunt.fora.pl Forum Index
->
Forge
Post a reply
Username
Subject
Message body
Emoticons
View more Emoticons
Font colour:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Indigo
Violet
White
Black
Font size:
Tiny
Small
Normal
Large
Huge
Close Tags
Options
HTML is
OFF
BBCode
is
ON
Smilies are
ON
Disable BBCode in this post
Disable Smilies in this post
Confirmation code: *
All times are GMT + 2 Hours
Select a forum
Team
----------------
Rules
Announcements
Assignments
Forge
Legal / publishing
Tips & Tricks
Pub
Design
----------------
Genre
Technologie
Implementacja
----------------
Schedule
Snapshots
Topic review
Author
Message
cheapbag214s
Posted: Sun 8:05, 01 Dec 2013
Post subject: one for cheap shot
Two 49ers fined $7,[url=http://www.pradaoutlety.com/]prada outlet online[/url],875,[url=http://www.outletonliner.com]prada outlet online[/url], one for cheap shot, one for white socks
APWhich is worse, taking a cheap shot at an opponent or wearing white socks? According to the league office,[url=http://www.oakleyoutleto.com/]oakley outlet[/url], they're equally bad.Or at least, they warrant equal fines. That's what two 49ers players found out last week.San Francisco offensive tackle Anthony Davis and safety Donte Whitner were both fined $7,875. Davis's fine was for unnecessary roughness, for a hit on Seattle's O’Brien Schofield last week. That hit also drew a personal foul flag from the officials.Whitner's fine was for wearing white socks. The rest of the 49ers were wearing red socks, but Whitner's were white, and that's an NFL no-no.We previously noted that Lions safety Louis Delmas was fined $5,250 for wearing the wrong color socks last week. There is no word from the league office about why Whitner's socks were considered $2,625 worse than Delmas's socks.
fora.pl
- załóż własne forum dyskusyjne za darmo
Powered by
phpBB
© 2001-2003 phpBB Group
Theme created by
Vjacheslav Trushkin
Regulamin