| cheapbag214s |
|
|
| |
| Joined: 27 Jun 2013 |
| Posts: 20570 |
Read: 0 topics
Warns: 0/5
|
| Location: England |
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
| might be that way to suggest solidity) that doesn't obviously scan as a U.I think a solid "C" and a more readable "U" isn't all that bad.Attached are six possibilities along that line.And in the spirit of full-and-frank exchange of views, in tasteful after-the-jump placement we have some comments in favor of the new look.'I can live with it.' Here is the closest thing I got to a "you're being unfair" message. It's from a graphic designer who list his credentials at the end of the message. I don't agree with him -- but, hey,[link widoczny dla zalogowanych], you realize that by now, and we might as well hear this side of the story.The original UC system "identity" was a seal. This is not the same as a brand identity in higher education. Most big schools have a seal (for diplomas, plaques, presidents stationary, proclamations) a brand identity (to market the place and identifier for signage,[link widoczny dla zalogowanych], etc.), and an athletics identity (the UC Bear, the UConn Husky, etc.). But this was about the UC system. It just needed |
|
