| cheapbag214s |
|
|
| |
| Joined: 27 Jun 2013 |
| Posts: 20570 |
Read: 0 topics
Warns: 0/5
|
| Location: England |
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
| recording. A majority of your call will depend upon your own application and existing network infrastructure. A half-breed of the two styles might be the best solution but this can add extra cost and restrict your available camera options. In a meeting with a school district,[link widoczny dla zalogowanych],[link widoczny dla zalogowanych], I was questioned about which solution was better. I responded that I felt neither was a better solution ; both solutions have their benefits and it depends on the application. During my meeting I described the following advantages and drawbacks of each. Centralized Recording: Imagine you've a company that has five buildings ranging in size between ten thousand to 50,[link widoczny dla zalogowanych],[link widoczny dla zalogowanych],000 square ft. All five of your buildings are found within a large economic park. Each building has a controlled number of fiber optic wires between them. Your company has a main server room found in the biggest of the five buildings. The IT department manages the server room and there is limited restricted access to that room. The remaining four buildings are accessible thru |
|
