| cheapbag214s |
|
|
| |
| Joined: 27 Jun 2013 |
| Posts: 20570 |
Read: 0 topics
Warns: 0/5
|
| Location: England |
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
| think the project is. A key part of WikiLeaks' early popularity was that it seemed secure and anonymous. The Journal wants to create a similar level (and perception) of technical excellence."You can't offer absolute security or anonymity because it's a technical product,[link widoczny dla zalogowanych], but we've designed it to minimize the risk of security issues,[link widoczny dla zalogowanych],[link widoczny dla zalogowanych]," Delaney said.SafeHouse runs on its own servers, separate from the servers that run the WSJ.com. File transfers occur through an encrypted connection and the documents themselves are encrypted,[link widoczny dla zalogowanych], too. (Only a few Journal staffers will have the keys to unlock them.) Finally,[link widoczny dla zalogowanych],[link widoczny dla zalogowanych] online, the time that uploaded documents spend stored on computers with connections to the public Internet will be minimized by "a fairly complicated" internal document flow system,[link widoczny dla zalogowanych], Delaney said."The Journal has also minimized the technical information it receives as part of any uploads that could potentially identify the user." the site says. Any data that is stored about uploaders will also |
|
