| cheapbag214s |
|
|
| |
| Joined: 27 Jun 2013 |
| Posts: 20570 |
Read: 0 topics
Warns: 0/5
|
| Location: England |
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
| in its western reaches and the ability to get transmission lines strung to the population centers of its east. The U.S.,[link widoczny dla zalogowanych], as a whole,[link widoczny dla zalogowanych], has essentially the same need but a worse regulatory regime.Offshore transmission is an even trickier business in some ways. Most submarine power cables use high-voltage direct current as opposed to the long-standard alternating current lines that constitute most of our grid. On the other hand, you're not trying to run a massive row of towers through anybody's ranch or past their exurban development.The line could support up to six gigawatts of turbines,[link widoczny dla zalogowanych], which would supply as much power as a few large coal plants, depending on how steadily the winds blow. While this is an exciting development,[link widoczny dla zalogowanych],[link widoczny dla zalogowanych],[link widoczny dla zalogowanych], it's important to keep in mind the scale of the transition the country faces in decarbonizing the electric system. The Department of Energy's National Renewable Energy Laboratory estimates the U.S. has 54 gigawatts of offshore wind capacity. The U.S. has more than 1,[link widoczny dla zalogowanych],400 coal power plants |
|
